Select Category
- All
- General
- Press Releases
- Uncategorized
- WILL News
- Farmview v. Evers
- Education Reform
- In the News
- Open Government
- WILL v. DPI
- Olsen v. NWTC
- General Commentary (Blog)
- St. Augustine v. Evers
- School Choice Wisconsin v. DPI
- Koschkee v. Evers
- Espinoza v. Montana
- VWF v. Eau Claire TID 12
- LWV v. Legislature
- K-12
- Education in WI
- K-12 Finance
- Health Care
- Act 10 Litigation
- Lueders v. Krug
- Jarchow v. State Bar of Wisconsin
- Shepherd's Watch
- VWF v. Eau Claire
- Bartlett v. Evers
- Mattoon v. Antigo
- WEC Complaint
- Case Updates
- SCWI v. DPI
- WILL v. MMSD
- Occupational Licensing
- Reports
- Religion
- Olguin v. DPI
- BCTA v. Brown County
- Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
- Hunter Nation v. WDNR
- Michigan v DeVos
- Washington V. DeVos
- WILL v RUSD
- Lindoo v. Evers
- Original Action v. Dane County Health
- DNC v. Bostellman
- SCWA v. Bowersox
- Gymfinity v. Dane County
- Free Markets
- Opportunity
- Regulatory Reform
- Law
- Constitutional Government
- School Choice
- Streetcar Challenge
- WEAC v. Walker
- Madison Teachers v. Walker
- Hoekstra v. City of Bayfield
- Rice v. Milw. County Board
- Baldwin-Woodville Sch. Dist.
- WPN v. Myse
- NCTQ v. UW Bd. of Regents
- JEAMEC v. Milwaukee
- MacIver v. Erpenbach
- LWV v. Walker
- NAACP v. Walker
- Voter ID Litigation
- Vanden Boogart v. Christensen
- ER Commentary
- Marone v. MATC
- Rice v. Milw. Co. Bd. 2013
- Laborers v. Walker
- Rosno v. WERC
- Krueger v. Appleton S.D.
- Coyne v. Walker
- McCutcheon v. FEC
- Young v. GAB
- WILL v. DOJ
- Frank v. Walker
- Johnson v. OPM
- Lacroix v. KUSD
- Ibrahim v. Milwaukee
- CRG Network v. GAB
- Highland Memorial v. Wisconsin
- Milewski v. Town of Dover
- John Doe Litigation
- KEA v. WERC
- Intl. Assoc. of Machinists v. Wisconsin
- Gerhard v. Green Bay
- Blaska v. MMSD
- Milwaukee Police Association v. Milwaukee
- Kittle v. Jefferson County
- McAdams v. Marquette
- SW v. Evers
- Center for Competitive Federalism
- Duncan v. Nevada
- Krist Oil
- In re GG
- SCOTUS
- DOJ FOIA lawsuit
- Smith v. Brancel
- St. Joan Antida v. MPS
- Gill v. Whitford
- Smith v. Brancel
- City of Bloomfield v. Felix
- TetraTech v. DOR
- Christie v. NCAA
- Civil Asset Forfeiture
- Isthmus v. Madison Police Department
- Roth v. Brostoff
- Murphy v. NCAA
- Lair v. Mangan
- CRG v. Stamper
- American Legion v. American Humanist Association
- Madison Police Oversight Board Notice of Claim
- Becker v. Dane County
- MPS Union Leave
- Madison Bird Glass NOC
- 21-23 State Budget
- DOC Letter
- Rabiebna v HEAB
- Equal Protection
- Equal Protection Project
- Faust v. Vilsack
- WPT v Town of Buchanan
- Vitolo v. Guzman
- Kettle Moraine Parental Rights
- Election Integrity
- Tiegan v WEC
- Elmbrook Demand Letter/Books
- Swimply
- Johnson v. WEC
- Individual Liberties
- Constitutional Government and Rule of Law
- Economic Freedom
- Education Reform
- Equality
- Policy
- Healthcare
- K-12 Education
- Regulatory Reform
- Free Markets
- Opportunity
- Election Integrity
- Petition
- Legislative Priorities
- nuziard
- Cases
- Amendments - August 13th
- Preserving Democracy Project
- Student Proficiency
- COVID-19
Victory: Pittsville School District Admits Parent’s Social Media Post Was Protected Speech, Settles First Amendment Dispute
WILL secured a settlement agreement with the School District of Pittsville to vindicate the First Amendment rights of Amanda Vogel, a parent who received litigation threats from school district officials and visits from law enforcement following a social media post.
Swan v Rollins
This lawsuit is brought by three Wisconsin dairy farmers forced to subsidize the Dairy Checkoff: a burdensome federal program that leads to the demise of small farms under the guise of environmental “sustainability.” Not only is this compelled subsidy Orwellian, but it also violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act.
WILL Sues USDA Over Unconstitutional Milk Tax
WILL filed a federal lawsuit against the USDA and the National Dairy Promotion and Research Board (Dairy Board) on behalf of three Wisconsin dairy farmers. The lawsuit challenges the unconstitutional Dairy Checkoff program, which forces dairy farmers to fund private, third-party organizations that promote radical and ideologically driven Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) agendas.
Wisconsin Dentists Could Lose Their Free Speech Rights—WILL Is Stepping In
A new Wisconsin rule would bar many dentists from telling patients, or even implying, that they specialize in certain fields. WILL filed a public comment with the Dentistry Examining Board, asking the Board to drop the rule or make significant changes to it.
WILL Backs HUD Plan to Let Public Housing Add Work Requirements
WILL filed a public comment in support of a new Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rule that would let public housing agencies and landlords require able-bodied adults receiving housing assistance to work up to 40 hours per week and limit assistance to two years.
The Gig Is Up for the 2024 Independent Contractor Rule
WILL submitted a comment letter to the U.S. Department of Labor in support of a reversing a Biden-era independent contractor rule which actively threatened the independence of workers and businesses by trapping them in an unpredictable regulatory guessing game.
WILL’s America 250 Student Contest: “What America Means to Me”
WILL announced the launch of its statewide student contest, “What America Means to Me,” celebrating the 250th anniversary of American Independence. The contest invites Wisconsin students in kindergarten through 12th grade to submit an original 30-60 second video reflecting on freedom, America’s founding principles, and the opportunities afforded by living in a free society.
USDA Settles WILL Lawsuit, Removes Race-Based Discrimination in Nationwide Farming Programs
WILL has successfully secured a major settlement with the USDA, triggering the end of race- and sex-based programs that harmed American farmers for decades. Following a federal lawsuit filed on behalf of Wisconsin dairy farmer Adam Faust, the USDA settled with WILL and agreed to end discriminatory preferences across three federal farming programs.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- 177
- 178
- 179
- 180
- 181
- 182
- 183
- 184
- 185
- 186
- 187
- 188
- 189
- 190
- 191
- 192
- 193
- 194
- 195
- 196
- 197
- 198
- 199
- 200
- 201
- 202
- 203
- 204
- 205
No results found.