Select Category
- All
- General
- Press Releases
- Uncategorized
- WILL News
- Farmview v. Evers
- Education Reform
- In the News
- Open Government
- WILL v. DPI
- Olsen v. NWTC
- General Commentary (Blog)
- St. Augustine v. Evers
- School Choice Wisconsin v. DPI
- Koschkee v. Evers
- Espinoza v. Montana
- VWF v. Eau Claire TID 12
- LWV v. Legislature
- K-12
- Education in WI
- K-12 Finance
- Health Care
- Act 10 Litigation
- Lueders v. Krug
- Jarchow v. State Bar of Wisconsin
- Shepherd's Watch
- VWF v. Eau Claire
- Bartlett v. Evers
- Mattoon v. Antigo
- WEC Complaint
- Case Updates
- SCWI v. DPI
- WILL v. MMSD
- Occupational Licensing
- Reports
- Religion
- Olguin v. DPI
- BCTA v. Brown County
- Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
- Hunter Nation v. WDNR
- Michigan v DeVos
- Washington V. DeVos
- WILL v RUSD
- Lindoo v. Evers
- Original Action v. Dane County Health
- DNC v. Bostellman
- SCWA v. Bowersox
- Gymfinity v. Dane County
- Free Markets
- Opportunity
- Regulatory Reform
- Law
- Constitutional Government
- School Choice
- Streetcar Challenge
- WEAC v. Walker
- Madison Teachers v. Walker
- Hoekstra v. City of Bayfield
- Rice v. Milw. County Board
- Baldwin-Woodville Sch. Dist.
- WPN v. Myse
- NCTQ v. UW Bd. of Regents
- JEAMEC v. Milwaukee
- MacIver v. Erpenbach
- LWV v. Walker
- NAACP v. Walker
- Voter ID Litigation
- Vanden Boogart v. Christensen
- ER Commentary
- Marone v. MATC
- Rice v. Milw. Co. Bd. 2013
- Laborers v. Walker
- Rosno v. WERC
- Krueger v. Appleton S.D.
- Coyne v. Walker
- McCutcheon v. FEC
- Young v. GAB
- WILL v. DOJ
- Frank v. Walker
- Johnson v. OPM
- Lacroix v. KUSD
- Ibrahim v. Milwaukee
- CRG Network v. GAB
- Highland Memorial v. Wisconsin
- Milewski v. Town of Dover
- John Doe Litigation
- KEA v. WERC
- Intl. Assoc. of Machinists v. Wisconsin
- Gerhard v. Green Bay
- Blaska v. MMSD
- Milwaukee Police Association v. Milwaukee
- Kittle v. Jefferson County
- McAdams v. Marquette
- SW v. Evers
- Center for Competitive Federalism
- Duncan v. Nevada
- Krist Oil
- In re GG
- SCOTUS
- DOJ FOIA lawsuit
- Smith v. Brancel
- St. Joan Antida v. MPS
- Gill v. Whitford
- Smith v. Brancel
- City of Bloomfield v. Felix
- TetraTech v. DOR
- Christie v. NCAA
- Civil Asset Forfeiture
- Isthmus v. Madison Police Department
- Roth v. Brostoff
- Murphy v. NCAA
- Lair v. Mangan
- CRG v. Stamper
- American Legion v. American Humanist Association
- Madison Police Oversight Board Notice of Claim
- Becker v. Dane County
- MPS Union Leave
- Madison Bird Glass NOC
- 21-23 State Budget
- DOC Letter
- Rabiebna v HEAB
- Equal Protection
- Equal Protection Project
- Faust v. Vilsack
- WPT v Town of Buchanan
- Vitolo v. Guzman
- Kettle Moraine Parental Rights
- Election Integrity
- Tiegan v WEC
- Elmbrook Demand Letter/Books
- Swimply
- Johnson v. WEC
- Individual Liberties
- Constitutional Government and Rule of Law
- Economic Freedom
- Education Reform
- Equality
- Policy
- Healthcare
- K-12 Education
- Regulatory Reform
- Free Markets
- Opportunity
- Election Integrity
- Petition
- Legislative Priorities
- nuziard
- Cases
- Amendments - August 13th
- Preserving Democracy Project
- Student Proficiency
- COVID-19
WILL-Backed Equality Amendment On November 2026 Ballot
The “Equality Amendment,” otherwise known as Assembly Joint Resolution 102 (AJR 102) will be on the November 2026 ballot after the Wisconsin State Senate voted in favor today. The Wisconsin State Assembly passed the amendment last week.
Wisconsin Senate Passes WILL-Backed Amendment to End Tax-Veto Loopholes
WILL issued a statement applauding the Wisconsin State Senate for passing Senate Joint Resolution 116 (SJR 116). This proposed amendment to the Wisconsin Constitution curbs executive overreach by prohibiting the governor from using the partial veto to create or increase taxes or fees.
Bothfield v. WEC & WBLD v WEC
On behalf of Wisconsin voters in all 8 of the state's congressional districts, WILL filed motions to intervene in two lawsuits seeking to overturn Wisconsin’s Congressional Maps. Seeking again to defend those maps on behalf of a group of Wisconsin voters, WILL argues that these new lawsuits are time-barred, the three-judge panel lacks authority to overrule the Wisconsin Supreme Court, and any attempt to impose new maps in this manner would violate federal law and the U.S. Constitution.
Trump Administration Re-Opens Investigation into Cleveland Clinic’s Racially Discriminatory Patient Programming
The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights (HHS-OCR) has re-opened a civil rights investigation into the Ohio-based Cleveland Clinic after a complaint was filed by Do No Harm (DNH) and its legal counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL).
Wisconsin School District Sends Police and Threatens Mother of Disabled Student Following Social Media Post
WILL is defending a Wisconsin mother after the School District of Pittsville, Wisconsin sent the police to her home and threatened her with a potential defamation lawsuit based on her social media post.
Wisconsin Assembly Advances WILL-Backed Equality Amendment
WILL issued a statement in support of the Wisconsin State Assembly for passing the “Equality Amendment,” otherwise known as Assembly Joint Resolution 102 (AJR 102). This is a proposed amendment to the Wisconsin Constitution that prohibits state and local governments from discriminating against or granting preferential treatment to individuals or groups based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public education, public contracting, and public administration.
WILL Uncovers More Race Discrimination Against UW Madison Students
WILL filed a new Title VI complaint following our continued investigation into race-based practices at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. This second complaint was filed on behalf of our client Young America’s Foundation (YAF), representing thousands of students across the country, including conservative students on the UW-Madison campus.
MPS Wins Big In Property Tax Shift
MPS, a school district with declining enrollment and only 8.1% of Wisconsin's public school population, is getting over 50% of the property tax revenue shift. Why is that? We explain why.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- 177
- 178
- 179
- 180
- 181
- 182
- 183
- 184
- 185
- 186
- 187
- 188
- 189
- 190
- 191
- 192
- 193
- 194
- 195
- 196
- 197
- 198
- 199
No results found.