Select Category
- All
- General
- Press Releases
- Uncategorized
- WILL News
- Farmview v. Evers
- Education Reform
- In the News
- Open Government
- WILL v. DPI
- Olsen v. NWTC
- General Commentary (Blog)
- St. Augustine v. Evers
- School Choice Wisconsin v. DPI
- Koschkee v. Evers
- Espinoza v. Montana
- VWF v. Eau Claire TID 12
- LWV v. Legislature
- K-12
- Education in WI
- K-12 Finance
- Health Care
- Act 10 Litigation
- Lueders v. Krug
- Jarchow v. State Bar of Wisconsin
- Shepherd's Watch
- VWF v. Eau Claire
- Bartlett v. Evers
- Mattoon v. Antigo
- WEC Complaint
- Case Updates
- SCWI v. DPI
- WILL v. MMSD
- Occupational Licensing
- Reports
- Religion
- Olguin v. DPI
- BCTA v. Brown County
- Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
- Hunter Nation v. WDNR
- Michigan v DeVos
- Washington V. DeVos
- WILL v RUSD
- Lindoo v. Evers
- Original Action v. Dane County Health
- DNC v. Bostellman
- SCWA v. Bowersox
- Gymfinity v. Dane County
- Free Markets
- Opportunity
- Regulatory Reform
- Law
- Constitutional Government
- School Choice
- Streetcar Challenge
- WEAC v. Walker
- Madison Teachers v. Walker
- Hoekstra v. City of Bayfield
- Rice v. Milw. County Board
- Baldwin-Woodville Sch. Dist.
- WPN v. Myse
- NCTQ v. UW Bd. of Regents
- JEAMEC v. Milwaukee
- MacIver v. Erpenbach
- LWV v. Walker
- NAACP v. Walker
- Voter ID Litigation
- Vanden Boogart v. Christensen
- ER Commentary
- Marone v. MATC
- Rice v. Milw. Co. Bd. 2013
- Laborers v. Walker
- Rosno v. WERC
- Krueger v. Appleton S.D.
- Coyne v. Walker
- McCutcheon v. FEC
- Young v. GAB
- WILL v. DOJ
- Frank v. Walker
- Johnson v. OPM
- Lacroix v. KUSD
- Ibrahim v. Milwaukee
- CRG Network v. GAB
- Highland Memorial v. Wisconsin
- Milewski v. Town of Dover
- John Doe Litigation
- KEA v. WERC
- Intl. Assoc. of Machinists v. Wisconsin
- Gerhard v. Green Bay
- Blaska v. MMSD
- Milwaukee Police Association v. Milwaukee
- Kittle v. Jefferson County
- McAdams v. Marquette
- SW v. Evers
- Center for Competitive Federalism
- Duncan v. Nevada
- Krist Oil
- In re GG
- SCOTUS
- DOJ FOIA lawsuit
- Smith v. Brancel
- St. Joan Antida v. MPS
- Gill v. Whitford
- Smith v. Brancel
- City of Bloomfield v. Felix
- TetraTech v. DOR
- Christie v. NCAA
- Civil Asset Forfeiture
- Isthmus v. Madison Police Department
- Roth v. Brostoff
- Murphy v. NCAA
- Lair v. Mangan
- CRG v. Stamper
- American Legion v. American Humanist Association
- Madison Police Oversight Board Notice of Claim
- Becker v. Dane County
- MPS Union Leave
- Madison Bird Glass NOC
- 21-23 State Budget
- DOC Letter
- Rabiebna v HEAB
- Equal Protection
- Equal Protection Project
- Faust v. Vilsack
- WPT v Town of Buchanan
- Vitolo v. Guzman
- Kettle Moraine Parental Rights
- Election Integrity
- Tiegan v WEC
- Elmbrook Demand Letter/Books
- Swimply
- Johnson v. WEC
- Individual Liberties
- Constitutional Government and Rule of Law
- Economic Freedom
- Education Reform
- Equality
- Policy
- Healthcare
- K-12 Education
- Regulatory Reform
- Free Markets
- Opportunity
- Election Integrity
- Petition
- Legislative Priorities
- nuziard
- Amendments - August 13th
DigitalDesk, Inc. v. Bexar County
In pursuit of “Equality Under the Law” and a true colorblind society for all Americans, the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) filed a lawsuit against a San Antonio-based government program called the “Bexar County Small Business Assistance Program.” WILL alleges that the $10 million program discriminates against small business owners based on race. The lawsuit names Bexar County, the home of San Antonio, and Liftfund Inc., a non-profit charged by the county to administer the program.
Reforming the Governor’s Partial Veto: How Should It Be Done?
To preserve the separation of powers and eliminate any ambiguity in the law, the legislature should strongly consider adopting a constitutional amendment.
WILL Launches “Equality for All Agenda” Following Supreme Court Decision Eliminating Affirmative Action
New Legislative Roadmap Lays the Groundwork for “Colorblind” Policies in Wisconsin and Across America
Equality For All
A Survey of Racially Discriminatory Laws, Programs, and Policies in Wisconsin
Executive Summary
The United States Supreme Court recently ...
Analysis: Evers 400 Year Veto
While the Governor’s decision to veto a tax cut for millions of Wisconsinites yesterday has garnered the most attention, slightly under the radar has been ...
WILL Client Will Not Face Fines for “Violating” COVID-19 Public Health Order
The News: Representing another legal victory for the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL), attorneys representing Public Health of Madison and ...
WILL Statement on Affirmative Action Case
Landmark Ruling Demands Equal Treatment: Colleges and Universities Must Immediately Dismantle Affirmative Action and Similar Discriminatory Policies
The ...
WILL Secures Major Victory for Property Taxpayers at Wisconsin Supreme Court
Unanimous SCOWIS ruling saves taxpayers in Buchanan nearly $1 million per year, and the precedent will protect taxpayers across Wisconsin for years to ...
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- 177
- 178
- 179