Select Category
- All
- General
- Press Releases
- Uncategorized
- WILL News
- Farmview v. Evers
- Education Reform
- In the News
- Open Government
- WILL v. DPI
- Olsen v. NWTC
- General Commentary (Blog)
- St. Augustine v. Evers
- School Choice Wisconsin v. DPI
- Koschkee v. Evers
- Espinoza v. Montana
- VWF v. Eau Claire TID 12
- LWV v. Legislature
- K-12
- Education in WI
- K-12 Finance
- Health Care
- Act 10 Litigation
- Lueders v. Krug
- Jarchow v. State Bar of Wisconsin
- Shepherd's Watch
- VWF v. Eau Claire
- Bartlett v. Evers
- Mattoon v. Antigo
- WEC Complaint
- Case Updates
- SCWI v. DPI
- WILL v. MMSD
- Occupational Licensing
- Reports
- Religion
- Olguin v. DPI
- BCTA v. Brown County
- Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
- Hunter Nation v. WDNR
- Michigan v DeVos
- Washington V. DeVos
- WILL v RUSD
- Lindoo v. Evers
- Original Action v. Dane County Health
- DNC v. Bostellman
- SCWA v. Bowersox
- Gymfinity v. Dane County
- Free Markets
- Opportunity
- Regulatory Reform
- Law
- Constitutional Government
- School Choice
- Streetcar Challenge
- WEAC v. Walker
- Madison Teachers v. Walker
- Hoekstra v. City of Bayfield
- Rice v. Milw. County Board
- Baldwin-Woodville Sch. Dist.
- WPN v. Myse
- NCTQ v. UW Bd. of Regents
- JEAMEC v. Milwaukee
- MacIver v. Erpenbach
- LWV v. Walker
- NAACP v. Walker
- Voter ID Litigation
- Vanden Boogart v. Christensen
- ER Commentary
- Marone v. MATC
- Rice v. Milw. Co. Bd. 2013
- Laborers v. Walker
- Rosno v. WERC
- Krueger v. Appleton S.D.
- Coyne v. Walker
- McCutcheon v. FEC
- Young v. GAB
- WILL v. DOJ
- Frank v. Walker
- Johnson v. OPM
- Lacroix v. KUSD
- Ibrahim v. Milwaukee
- CRG Network v. GAB
- Highland Memorial v. Wisconsin
- Milewski v. Town of Dover
- John Doe Litigation
- KEA v. WERC
- Intl. Assoc. of Machinists v. Wisconsin
- Gerhard v. Green Bay
- Blaska v. MMSD
- Milwaukee Police Association v. Milwaukee
- Kittle v. Jefferson County
- McAdams v. Marquette
- SW v. Evers
- Center for Competitive Federalism
- Duncan v. Nevada
- Krist Oil
- In re GG
- SCOTUS
- DOJ FOIA lawsuit
- Smith v. Brancel
- St. Joan Antida v. MPS
- Gill v. Whitford
- Smith v. Brancel
- City of Bloomfield v. Felix
- TetraTech v. DOR
- Christie v. NCAA
- Civil Asset Forfeiture
- Isthmus v. Madison Police Department
- Roth v. Brostoff
- Murphy v. NCAA
- Lair v. Mangan
- CRG v. Stamper
- American Legion v. American Humanist Association
- Madison Police Oversight Board Notice of Claim
- Becker v. Dane County
- MPS Union Leave
- Madison Bird Glass NOC
- 21-23 State Budget
- DOC Letter
- Rabiebna v HEAB
- Equal Protection
- Equal Protection Project
- Faust v. Vilsack
- WPT v Town of Buchanan
- Vitolo v. Guzman
- Kettle Moraine Parental Rights
- Election Integrity
- Tiegan v WEC
- Elmbrook Demand Letter/Books
- Swimply
- Johnson v. WEC
- Individual Liberties
- Constitutional Government and Rule of Law
- Economic Freedom
- Education Reform
- Equality
- Policy
- Healthcare
- K-12 Education
- Regulatory Reform
- Free Markets
- Opportunity
- Election Integrity
- Petition
- Legislative Priorities
- nuziard
- Cases
- Amendments - August 13th
- Preserving Democracy Project
- Student Proficiency
- COVID-19
WILL Represents Coalition of Parents, Taxpayers, and Schools to Protect Choice Program and Taxpayers
WILL represents a group of Wisconsin taxpayers, parents, and choice schools in a motion to intervene in Wisconsin PTA v. Wisconsin State Assembly. The complaint in that case seeks to have the judiciary determine the level and distribution of funding for education in this State rather than leave those decisions to the Legislature and seeks to reduce or eliminate Wisconsin’s School Choice Programs.
New Richmond Parents for Strong Schools v. New Richmond School District
New Richmond Parents for Strong Schools has filed a federal lawsuit against the New Richmond School District, alleging that its bathroom policy violates the rights of high school girls under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. WILL represents the Association—which includes both parents and female students—seeking an end to the district’s policy and a declaration that the girls’ civil rights were violated by the district’s actions.
Wisconsin Parents & High School Girls Sue New Richmond School District
New Richmond Parents for Strong Schools has filed a federal lawsuit against the New Richmond School District, alleging that its bathroom policy violates the rights of high school girls under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. WILL represents the Association—which includes both parents and female students—seeking an end to the district’s policy and a declaration that the girls’ civil rights were violated by the district’s actions.
Wisconsin Parents Underestimate or Don’t Fully Know School Funding Levels, New Survey Shows
WILL, in partnership with 50CAN, a national nonpartisan education reform nonprofit, has released a new survey of Wisconsin parents. The findings reveal continued gaps in parental awareness of school spending, some improvement in knowledge of educational options, but a surprising gap in “workforce confidence.”
WILL Reacts to the Bothfield Redistricting Case Dismissal
WILL praised a decision by a circuit court to dismiss a lawsuit against Wisconsin’s current congressional Maps. WILL filed motions to intervene in two lawsuits seeking to overturn Wisconsin’s Congressional Maps. Seeking again to defend those maps on behalf of a group of Wisconsin voters.
Evers Vetoes Bipartisan, Pro-Educator Legislation to Encourage Safe Classrooms
WILL issued a statement in response to Governor Evers veto of AB 614 / SB 611, known as the Teacher Bill of Rights. The bill would have strengthened teachers’ authority to manage their classrooms, required parental notification when serious classroom incidents occur, and established clearer accountability so teachers can focus on teaching.
Evers Vetoes New Education Opportunities for Wisconsin Families
WILL issued a statement in response to Governor Evers veto of Assembly Bill 602, legislation that would have had the effect of opting Wisconsin into a new federal tax credit scholarship program for K-12 students.
WILL: Evers Veto of “Red Tape Reset” is Irresponsible
Governor Tony Evers vetoed the WILL-backed “Red Tape Reset,” a comprehensive regulatory reform package supported by a broad coalition of free-market groups and Wisconsin job creators.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- 177
- 178
- 179
- 180
- 181
- 182
- 183
- 184
- 185
- 186
- 187
- 188
- 189
- 190
- 191
- 192
- 193
- 194
- 195
- 196
- 197
- 198
- 199
- 200
- 201
- 202
- 203
No results found.