Earle Asphalt Company, Inc. v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority

Case Overview

Case Name: Earle Asphalt Company, Inc. v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority
Type of Case: Equality Under the Law
Court: United States District Court District of New Jersey
Case Number: 3:26-cv-04860
Filed On: 04/30/2026
Current Status: WILL and PLF filed a complaint on April 30th, 2026.

Meet The Client

Earle Asphalt Company, Inc. is a heavy civil construction firm founded in 1968 in Wall, New Jersey. From humble beginnings as a small paving company, Earle has grown into New Jersey’s leading heavy highway firm, employing over 650 people and deriving approximately 80% of its revenue from government contracts — all of which are now threatened by the State’s unconstitutional mandates.
Lawyers

Lucas Vebber

Deputy Counsel

For nearly six decades, Earle has built New Jersey’s statewide infrastructure on merit and free choice. That model is now under attack. New Jersey law requires contractors to comply with “targeted goals” across 18 trades, forcing Earle to track and report employees by race and sex — and subjecting the company to fines, penalties, and lower contract ratings for noncompliance.  

The NJTA further requires Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) that compel “open shop” firms like Earle to accept exclusive union representation, stripping workers of the right to choose their own representation and forcing Earle to associate with unions.  

WILL and PLF argue that these mandates violate the Constitution on two fronts: racial hiring quotas breach the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, while the PLA requirement violates the First Amendment’s protections against compelled speech and association. 

Press Release

  • Earle Asphalt Company, Inc. v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority (4/30/2026) - WILL alongside the Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) filed a federal lawsuit against the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA), Ocean County and Evesham Township on behalf of Earle Asphalt Company, a transportation contractor. The lawsuit challenges unconstitutional mandates that force contractors to meet rigid race and sex-based hiring quotas as well as force them to unionize.
Case Documents

Complaint, April 2026