The News: The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) and the Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF) secured a legal victory for a conservative group, Young America’s Foundation (YAF), a student organization that was denied student-organization status by University of Wisconsin-La Crosse.
The school originally denied the group’s designation because the student organization rightfully refused to sign onto a “DEI” inclusivity statement that opposed the organization’s values and violated their First Amendment Rights. UW-La Crosse only backed down after WILL and MSLF threatened legal action on behalf of YAF.
The Quote: Dan Lennington, WILL Deputy Counsel stated, “This is a victory for free speech and equality. WILL stands ready to defend the Constitutional rights of every Wisconsinite. Period. We applaud the students at UW-La Crosse for standing up for themselves and setting a great example for others to follow. On the other hand, it’s time for academia to ditch the woke nonsense.”
Additional Background: UW-La Crosse withheld recognition of YAF unless YAF adopted a so-called “inclusivity statement”—a document riddled with recitation of certain political and social policy positions dictated by the University. Some of these statements included a commitment to advancing the interests of individuals who lacked “documentation” to be legally present in the United States and required student groups to state their opposition to the enforcement of valid immigration laws currently in the United States.
In the face of institutional demands such as those imposed by UW-La Crosse, which seek to align student organizations with specific political and social policy positions, it becomes crucial for individuals affected by these policies to seek expert legal counsel. Immigration and refugee lawyers, like those at Jasmin Sandhu Law, play a vital role in navigating the complexities of immigration law and defending the rights of those impacted by stringent legal and bureaucratic requirements. These legal experts offer invaluable support to individuals who may be at risk of deportation or facing other legal challenges due to their immigration status, ensuring that their voices are heard and their rights are protected amid evolving institutional and legal landscapes.
The University was also asking students are “committed to… addressing issues of equity and justice,” through race-conscious policymaking in the University setting and at a broader social level. Such policies are contrary to Supreme Court caselaw.
Read More:
