Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty
  • Home
  • About
    • What We Do
    • Guiding Principles
    • Board of Directors
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Victories
    • Testimonials
    • Careers
  • Law
    • Preserving Democracy
    • Individual Liberties
    • Constitutional Government and Rule of Law
    • Economic Freedom
    • Education Reform
    • Equality
  • Policy
    • Healthcare
      • Healthcare Price Transparency
    • Education
      • School Scorecard
      • Higher Education
      • Restoring American Education
    • Regulatory Reform
    • Opportunity
    • Election Integrity
    • Legislative Priorities
  • Media
    • Blog
    • Press Releases
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Contact a lawyer
  • Donate
Select Page
WILL to Biden Education Department: Critical Race Theory is Wrong for Public Schools

WILL to Biden Education Department: Critical Race Theory is Wrong for Public Schools

May 21, 2021 | Equal Protection Project, General, K-12, Press Releases

WILL weighs in on federal Department of Education priority to advance equity in American History and Civics The News: The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) submitted public comment to the United States Department of Education against the adoption of a...

Archives

  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Categories

  • 21-23 State Budget
  • Act 10 Litigation
  • American Legion v. American Humanist Association
  • Baldwin-Woodville Sch. Dist.
  • Bartlett v. Evers
  • BCTA v. Brown County
  • Becker v. Dane County
  • Blaska v. MMSD
  • Case Updates
  • Center for Competitive Federalism
  • Christie v. NCAA
  • City of Bloomfield v. Felix
  • Civil Asset Forfeiture
  • Constitutional Government
  • Constitutional Government and Rule of Law
  • Coyne v. Walker
  • CRG Network v. GAB
  • CRG v. Stamper
  • DNC v. Bostellman
  • DOC Letter
  • DOJ FOIA lawsuit
  • Duncan v. Nevada
  • Economic Freedom
  • Education in WI
  • Education Reform
  • Education Reform
  • Election Integrity
  • Election Integrity
  • Elmbrook Demand Letter/Books
  • Equal Protection
  • Equal Protection Project
  • Equality
  • ER Commentary
  • Espinoza v. Montana
  • Farmview v. Evers
  • Faust v. Vilsack
  • Frank v. Walker
  • Free Markets
  • Free Markets
  • Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
  • General
  • General Commentary (Blog)
  • Gerhard v. Green Bay
  • Gill v. Whitford
  • Gymfinity v. Dane County
  • Health Care
  • Healthcare
  • Highland Memorial v. Wisconsin
  • Hoekstra v. City of Bayfield
  • Hunter Nation v. WDNR
  • Ibrahim v. Milwaukee
  • In re GG
  • In the News
  • Individual Liberties
  • Intl. Assoc. of Machinists v. Wisconsin
  • Isthmus v. Madison Police Department
  • Jarchow v. State Bar of Wisconsin
  • JEAMEC v. Milwaukee
  • John Doe Litigation
  • Johnson v. OPM
  • Johnson v. WEC
  • K-12
  • K-12 Education
  • K-12 Finance
  • KEA v. WERC
  • Kettle Moraine Parental Rights
  • Kittle v. Jefferson County
  • Koschkee v. Evers
  • Krist Oil
  • Krueger v. Appleton S.D.
  • Laborers v. Walker
  • Lacroix v. KUSD
  • Lair v. Mangan
  • Law
  • Lindoo v. Evers
  • Lueders v. Krug
  • LWV v. Legislature
  • LWV v. Walker
  • MacIver v. Erpenbach
  • Madison Bird Glass NOC
  • Madison Police Oversight Board Notice of Claim
  • Madison Teachers v. Walker
  • Marone v. MATC
  • Mattoon v. Antigo
  • McAdams v. Marquette
  • McCutcheon v. FEC
  • Michigan v DeVos
  • Milewski v. Town of Dover
  • Milwaukee Police Association v. Milwaukee
  • MPS Union Leave
  • Murphy v. NCAA
  • NAACP v. Walker
  • NCTQ v. UW Bd. of Regents
  • Occupational Licensing
  • Olguin v. DPI
  • Olsen v. NWTC
  • Open Government
  • Opportunity
  • Opportunity
  • Original Action v. Dane County Health
  • Petition
  • Policy
  • Press Releases
  • Rabiebna v HEAB
  • Regulatory Reform
  • Regulatory Reform
  • Religion
  • Reports
  • Rice v. Milw. Co. Bd. 2013
  • Rice v. Milw. County Board
  • Rosno v. WERC
  • Roth v. Brostoff
  • School Choice
  • School Choice Wisconsin v. DPI
  • SCOTUS
  • SCWA v. Bowersox
  • SCWI v. DPI
  • Shepherd's Watch
  • Smith v. Brancel
  • Smith v. Brancel
  • St. Augustine v. Evers
  • St. Joan Antida v. MPS
  • Streetcar Challenge
  • SW v. Evers
  • Swimply
  • TetraTech v. DOR
  • Tiegan v WEC
  • Uncategorized
  • Vanden Boogart v. Christensen
  • Vitolo v. Guzman
  • Voter ID Litigation
  • VWF v. Eau Claire
  • VWF v. Eau Claire TID 12
  • Washington V. DeVos
  • WEAC v. Walker
  • WEC Complaint
  • WILL News
  • WILL v RUSD
  • WILL v. DOJ
  • WILL v. DPI
  • WILL v. MMSD
  • WPN v. Myse
  • WPT v Town of Buchanan
  • Young v. GAB

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • RSS

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress