Case Name: Parents Protecting Our Children v. Eau Claire Area School District, et al.
Type of Case: Parental rights
Court: Waukesha County Circuit Court, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Filed On: September 7, 2022
Current Status: WILL’s Cert petition was denied at SCOTUS. Three justices disented in that decision.
WILL Reacts to SCOTUS Review of Consequential Parental Rights Case
December 9, 2024 | WILL, alongside America First Legal (AFL), sought SCOTUS review on behalf of an association of Wisconsin parents who opposed a school district’s secret gender transition policy that sidelined parental consent. WILL and AFL lost on standing in lower courts and never reached the merits. Three SCOTUS justices dissented, while just four would have been sufficient for the case to be heard.
WILL and America First Legal (AFL) Seek SCOTUS Review in Consequential Parental Rights Case
June 5, 2024 | Our writ petition asks the Court to take the case to hold that when a school district adopts an explicit policy to usurp parental decision-making authority over a major health-related decision—and to conceal this from the parents—parents who are subject to the policy have standing to challenge it.
PARENTS SUE EAU CLAIRE SCHOOL DISTRICT OVER POLICY THAT HIDES GENDER TRANSITIONS
September 7, 2022 | Attorneys with The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) and America First Legal (AFL) filed a federal lawsuit against the Eau Claire Area School District (ECASD), the superintendent, and the school board for adopting policies that facilitate gender transitions that might occur at school without any parental notification or consent.
The Lawsuit: America First Legal and WILL represent Parents Protecting Our Children, a local group of Eau Claire parents who have children in the Eau Claire Area School District. The lawsuit claims Eau Claire’s policy violates fundamental constitutionally recognized parental rights, including the right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children. It also violates First Amendment guarantees to the free exercise of religion by concealing from parents their child’s struggle with gender identity issues and directly interfering with their right to teach and guide their children through gender identity issues in accordance with their religious beliefs.
Background: The Eau Claire Area School District has adopted and trained its staff on a gender identity policy that enables minor students to change their gender identity at school, by adopting a new name and pronouns, and using opposite-sex facilities without parental notice or consent. In its training on this policy, the facilitator’s notes emphasize that “parents are not entitled to know their kids’ identities,” but must “earn” that knowledge. And religious objections from parents are, according to the facilitator’s notes, “weaponization of religion against queer people.” One teacher, taking this policy to heart, posted a sign that said, “if your parents aren’t accepting of your identity, I’m your mom now.”
ECASD’s policy not only violates parents’ well-established constitutional rights, it also runs directly counter to the advice of numerous medical professionals who recommend that health professionals defer to parents on this, given the serious, long-term implications of gender identity transitions during childhood.
CASE DOCUMENTS
-
- Complaint Against Eau Claire School Area School District, September 7, 2022
- Exhibit A, September 7, 2022
- Exhibit B, September 7, 2022
- Exhibit C, September 7, 2022
- 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion, March 7, 2024
- 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Order, March 7, 2024
- Petition for Writ of Certiorari, June 5, 2024
- SCOTUS Order Denying Cert Petition and Dissents, Issued December 2024